More Thoughts on Putting Public Notices On-line Rather Than in Newspapers

Two years ago, I asserted that public notices should be in the newspaper. I did not take that position to guaranty newspapers a source of revenue, but because the reader will know where the notice will be published and will be able to find the notices section and because publication is a verifiable historical fact.

Certainly on-line publication has some advantages, such as cost and the ability to search notices.

Recently I saw an article in the New Jersey Globe which reported that the Warren County commissioners were concerned about spending taxpayer money to publish notices in newspapers that are read by only one percent of the population and suggested that some form of online publication would reach more people. (Our county government is refreshingly frugal.) The article also reported that county officials have read trouble placing notices “because newspaper employees don’t always respond to calls.”

Assuming (perhaps contrary to fact) that the purpose of the requirement that certain notices be published in to inform the public and not to subsidize newspapers, here is a non-exclusive list (in on particular order) of things to consider:

  • Will the notice be in a predictable place?
  • Will the notices on a website be easily found?
  • How long will the notice be available? (What will the legal result be if a notice becomes unavailable prematurely?)
  • Will the notices be in the same place, at least for all entities associated with the county or municipality, or will an interested member of the public have to search many websites?
  • What kind of customer service will the website have for those seeking to place notices?
  • What will the response time be (how quickly will an on-line notice be published after it is provided to the operator of the website)?

Jay Bohn

August 7, 2023

Kudos to CNN for Coverage of Third Trump Indictment

On Tuesday former President Donald Trump was indicted for the third time. A federal grand jury in Washington now accuses him of several federal crimes related to his attempts to avoid the fact that he lost the 2020 presidential election. I hope to be able to write about the charges in the near future, but the point of this post is to congratulate CNN.com for its coverage of the event.

A continuing theme of my posts about journalism has been the need for the news media to present accurate facts and not just conclusions or opinions. I pretty much said exactly that in one of my first posts, The News Media Should Give Us More Details — Not Just Conclusions. Last year I pointed out the lack of detailed coverage of the actual claims that Trump supporters had made and why they are false.

That’s why I was very glad, and just a bit surprised, that CNN has published not just the full text of the 45-page indictment, but also annotated it.

Trump’s post-election conduct, especially leading up to and during the attack on the Capitol on January 6, 2021, was certainly troubling and now we will get the chance to see if it was criminal. It will be up to prosecutors to prove that Trump engaged in the conduct that the indictment charges and that that conduct equates in law to the charged criminal offenses. A resolution of these charges is more important than the other criminal cases against Trump and I hope for a prompt and public trial, with detailed, accurate, and objective coverage (oh, and a public that pays attention).

Jay Bohn

August 3, 2023